Legal Opinion

City of South Euclid v. Novak

South Euclid Municipal Court

Decided November 6, 1965No. Nos. 7714, 7715, 7716, 7717 and 7718Published

1Opinion of the CourtKlein, J.

The defendant has filed a motion to quash the affidavits in Cases Nos. 7714, 7715, 7716, 7717 and 7718. On 6/15/65, a previous motion to quash the original affidavits was sustained. Substitute affidavits were filed on 7/30/65, these affidavits being more detailed than the original affidavits. The question now before this court is whether or not a motion to quash should be sustained with respect to these substitute affidavits.

Since the language of the affidavits in all five of these cases is substantially the same (except for the dates and names set forth therein) and since the law applicable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. ZdovcOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
  2. City of Cincinnati v. McKinneyOhio Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. State v. GutillaOhio Court of Appeals · 1950
  4. State v. ParksOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Cleveland City v. GogolaOhio Court of Appeals · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API