Legal Opinion

City of Cincinnati v. McKinney

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 14, 1955No. 7975PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthews, J.

The defendant, appellant herein, was convicted of petit larceny on an affidavit filed by Martha M. Furth, charging her with having stolen a shopping bag and contents of the value of $24.42 on February 10, 1954, with having been convicted, sentenced and imprisoned in the Cincinnati, Ohio, workhouse three times previously, and with being, therefore, an habitual offender under the provisions of Section 4131, General Code, now Section 753.07, Revised Code. One of the prior convictions listed in the affidavit and mittimus in this case was on an affidavit filed by Lillian Nitschke charging the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Graham v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. State v. PetroOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  3. State v. LawsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. State v. HuttonOhio Supreme Court · 1937

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hall v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Pearson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  3. In Re SchottOhio Court of Appeals · 1968
  4. State v. GaskeySupreme Court of Iowa · 1963
  5. Deiter v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API