Legal Opinion

Cleveland City v. Gogola

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 9, 1944No. 19734PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By SKEEL, J.

The defendant was arrested and convicted on two separate charges of being a “common beggar” in violation of Section *4543003 of the Municipal Code of the City of Cleveland. The provisions of the section insofar as they are applicable to the instant case, provide as follows:

“If any common beggar * * * shall be found in the city, any such person shall be subject to prosecution before the criminal branch of the Municipal Court and upon conviction thereof shall be fined * * *. The term ‘common beggar’ as used in this section shall not be construed or defined as to prevent .…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of South Euclid v. NovakSouth Euclid Municipal Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API