Legal Opinion

State v. Osman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 2010No. 82671-4PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanders, J.

¶1 We are asked to decide whether a missing portion of the electronic record of a suppression hearing — containing the end of the cross-examination of the defendant, the redirect examination, arguments from counsel, admission of an exhibit (to which the defense objected), and the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law — is “significant or material” under RALJ 5.4. Because the missing portion is material to an appeal here, the defendant is entitled to a new trial.

*636FACTS

¶2 According to the testimony of the arresting officer, the officer stopped a vehicle driven by Abdinasir Osman…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. CamarilloWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. DowningWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. DowningWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. P.E. Systems, LLC v. CPI Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. State v. SimsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  4. State v. SimsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. McEnroeWashington Supreme Court · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API