Legal Opinion

State v. Robinson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 2005No. 74611-7PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*691¶ 1 We are asked to determine whether CrR 3.1(b)(2) requires that counsel be provided at state expense for all defendants who move to withdraw their guilty pleas after sentencing pursuant to CrR 7.8. We hold that it does not and affirm the Court of Appeals.

Fairhurst, J.

I. FACTS

¶2 Tony Douglas Robinson entered two separate Alford1} pleas to one count of kidnapping and one count of delivery of cocaine. He received a separate sentence for each count. Robinson directly appealed his kidnapping conviction, alleging in part breach of the plea agreement. At all times during plea bargaining,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Restaurant Development, Inc. v. Cananwill, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. State v. JeffersonWashington Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. RafayWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. GurskeWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  4. In Re the Detention of D.F.F.Washington Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Burt v. WASH. STATE DEPT. OF CORRECTIONSWashington Supreme Court · 2010

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API