State v. Sims
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtOwens, J.
¶1 Our state constitution provides a right of direct appeal in criminal cases. Const. art. I, § 22. Here, Jack Irvin Sims sought to exercise his right of appeal by challenging only a particular condition of his sentence; he *439does not challenge his underlying conviction or the main components of his sentence. The State conceded that the specific sentencing condition that Sims challenged was unconstitutional and then argued that every part of Sims’s sentence should be revoked and remanded to the trial court for reconsideration. To grant the State’s request would constitute undue affirmative…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. BahlWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. RitchieWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. MoenWashington Supreme Court · 1996
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Lodis v. Corbis Holdings, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- State v. SimsWashington Supreme Court · 2011
- Clark County v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardWashington Supreme Court · 2013
- State Of Washington v. Jason SpauldingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- Singletary v. Manor Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2012
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.