Legal Opinion

Pell v. New Bedford Gas & Edison Light Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 2, 1950PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

In this action of tort, each of the three counts of the declaration alleges that the plaintiff was employed for many years by the defendant as an office and stock record clerk; that due to the negligence of the de-. fendant the “lighting conditions” at her place of employment were insufficient or inadequate, resulting in injury to her eyes; and that this “rose out of and in the course of” ■ her employment, but is not a compensable injury under G. L. (Ter. Ed.) c. 152. The first count further alleges that she worked “under insufficient and antiquated lighting system” and “poor lighting…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Hurle's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. White v. E. T. Slattery Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
  3. DeFilippo's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  4. Hunnewell's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1915
  5. Clark v. M. W. Leahy Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Howes v. KelmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  2. Zerofski's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Grant v. CarlisleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1951
  4. Trombetta's CaseMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973
  5. Blair v. Board of SelectmenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API