Coley v. City of Hartford
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALVORD, J.
The plaintiff, Orville Coley, administrator of the estate of Loma Coley,1 appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendant, the city of Hartford (city). He claims that the court improperly concluded that there was no genuine issue of material fact as to whether certain police officers’ response to a report of family violence constituted a discretionary, as opposed to a ministerial, act. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts, viewed in the light most favorable to the plaintiff,2 are relevant to our disposition of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gordon v. Bridgeport Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Shore v. Town of StoningtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Violano v. FernandezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Doe v. PetersenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. FERNANDO A.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Albarran v. BlessingDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
- Coley v. HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014
- Coley v. HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2014
- Texidor v. ThibedeauConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016