Legal Opinion

Albe v. City of New Orleans

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 17, 2014No. 2014-CA-0186PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL A. BONIN, Judge.

11Vernetta Ballard, one of the current plaintiffs in this putative class-action lawsuit, concedes that her tort claims against the defendants, the City of New Orleans and its contractor, American Traffic Solutions, Inc., would be prescribed because they were not asserted within the applicable one-year prescriptive period. But, she argues, that by applying the softening doctrine of contra non valentem, the one-year prescriptive period is tolled and her claims are timely, and thus the district court’s sustaining of American Traffic’s exception of prescription and dismissal…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Carter v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
  2. Spott v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  3. Plaquemines Par. Com'n Council v. Delta Dev. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  4. Marin v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
  5. Williams v. Sewerage & Water Bd. of NOSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Scott v. ZaheriLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
  2. M.R. Pittman Group, L.L.C. v. Plaquemines Parish GovernmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Bayou Fleet, Inc. v. Bollinger Shipyards, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  4. In re Medical Review Panel Claim of ScottLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  5. M.R. Pittman Group, L.L.C. v. Plaquemines Parish GovernmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API