Legal Opinion
M.R. Pittman Group, L.L.C. v. Plaquemines Parish Government
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided December 2, 2015No. 2015-CA-860PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL A. BONIN, Judge.
hThe Plaquemines Parish Government seeks reversal of the trial court’s partial summary judgment that dismissed with prejudice its tort claim, asserted as one of the claims in its reconventional demand, against M.R. Pittman Group, L.L.C., on the grounds of prescription. Plaquemines Parish argues that the trial judge incorrectly decided that there was no genuine issue of material fact whether the softening doctrine of contra non valentem was applicable.
Because the partial summary judgment was not a final appealable judgment, we first decide in our discretion to exercise our…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Greenlaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Carter v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Plaquemines Par. Com'n Council v. Delta Dev. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
- Marin v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
- Hogg v. Chevron USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Landmark American Insurance Company v. Pin-Pon Corporation and Lexington Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- Danna v. Ritz-Carlton Hotel Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- MR Pittman Group, LLC v. Plaquemines Parish GovernmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Johno v. DoeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- M.R. Pittman Group, L.L.C. v. Plaquemines Parish GovernmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.