M.R. Pittman Group, L.L.C. v. Plaquemines Parish Government
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL A. BONIN, Judge.
|, Rejecting the argument of the third party plaintiff, Plaquemines Parish Government, that its tort claim was not prescribed because of the application of the softening doctrine of contra non valentem, the trial judge sustained the exception of prescription filed by the third party defendant, The Gray Insurance Company. Plaquemines Parish appeals.
We have reviewed the trial judge’s factual findings under the well-known manifest error or clearly wrong standard. We find that the trial judge was not clearly wrong in his reasonable factual findings both that Plaquemines…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Greenlaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Campo v. CorreaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2002
- Carter v. HaygoodSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- MJ Farms, Ltd. v. Exxon Mobil Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
- Spott v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- M.R. Pittman Group, L.L.C. v. Plaquemines Parish GovernmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- MR Pittman Group, LLC v. Plaquemines Parish GovernmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- In re Medical Review Panel Claim of ScottLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
- Barkerding v. WhittakerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Barkerding v. WhittakerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.