Legal Opinion

Reed v. McCready

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1912No. Docket No. 111PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Kent; Perkins, J. Trover and case by Ernest C. Reed against LaMott R. McOready for the conversion of a promissory note. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

The statement of facts in this case does not comply with the requirements of rule 40 because the same is not distinct from argument. It appears that the subject-matter of the suit was a promissory note made by one Edward B. Downing bearing date May 9, 1908, for the sum of $642.40, payable to the plaintiff or order, and due on or before three years from date, with interest from date until paid at the rate of 6 per cent, per annum. This note was No. 3 of a series of three vendor’s lien notes given by Downing to the plaintiff as part of the purchase price of some Texas land which had been deeded…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gardiner v. CourtrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Hovey v. SebringMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Graham v. Cass Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Wiest v. LuyendykMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Barnes v. PeetMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. ConterioMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Baxter v. WoodwardMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Moore v. AndrewsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Simmer v. Cutter's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Radford v. GauklerMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API