Legal Opinion

Lee v. Market Street Railway Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1901No. S.F. No. 1590PublishedCited by 23 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. P. F. Dunne, G. W. Baker, and C. Michener, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by plaintiff. A verdict was given in his favor, judgment in due course followed, and from that judgment and from the order denying defendant a new trial it appeals.

Upon the evening of September 8, 1897, plaintiff attempted to cross Kearny Street in the block between Jackson and Washington streets. While upon the track of the street railroad he was struck by an electric car approaching from Washington Street, and sustained the injuries complained of, the most serious of which was a crushed foot, necessitating…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Esrey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Fox v. Oakland Consolidated Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Illinois Trust & Savings Bank v. Pacific Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Rudel v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Avakian v. NobleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Harrington v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Green v. Los Angeles Terminal Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Bennichsen v. Market-Street Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API