Bennichsen v. Market-Street Ry. Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
This is an action to recover damages on behalf of the infant plaintiff for- personal injuries alleged to have been caused by being struck by a moving car of defendant. The verdict and judgment were for plaintiff, and defendant appeals from an order denying its motion for a new trial.
The important features of the case are these: At the time of the alleged injuries defendant was operating a double-track electric street railroad on Sansome Street in San Francisco, the street running north and south.. Defendant also was operating a similar street railroad on Broadway Street, which runs east and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Harrington v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Esrey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Lee v. Market Street Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by25 opinions
- Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Thompson v. Los Angeles & San Diego Beach Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Denver City Tramway Co. v. CobbCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
- Starck v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Tucker v. United RailroadsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.