Jackson v. Buesgens
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Otis, Justice.
Plaintiffs, James and Mary Jackson, have recovered a verdict of $4,000 for damages sustained by water seepage in the basement of a home purchased from defendants. The only issues necessary for decision are whether defendants’ representations constituted an express oral warranty; whether admissions made by defendants should have been excluded as an offer of settlement; and whether the amount of the award is justified by the evidence.
In response to a newspaper ad, the Jacksons entered negotiations with defendants, Robert J. and Betty Buesgens, for the purchase of a home in Carver…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Esser v. BropheySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- HP Droher & Sons v. ToushinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- L'Evesque v. RognrudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- State v. SchobergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Marshall v. Marvin H. Anderson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- Au v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- LaValle v. Aqualand Pool Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Meyer v. HansenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Steadman v. TurnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.