Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Buesgens

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 9, 1971No. 42377PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Otis, Justice.

Plaintiffs, James and Mary Jackson, have recovered a verdict of $4,000 for damages sustained by water seepage in the basement of a home purchased from defendants. The only issues necessary for decision are whether defendants’ representations constituted an express oral warranty; whether admissions made by defendants should have been excluded as an offer of settlement; and whether the amount of the award is justified by the evidence.

In response to a newspaper ad, the Jacksons entered negotiations with defendants, Robert J. and Betty Buesgens, for the purchase of a home in Carver…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Esser v. BropheySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  2. HP Droher & Sons v. ToushinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. L'Evesque v. RognrudSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  4. State v. SchobergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  5. Marshall v. Marvin H. Anderson Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. ATHERTON CONDO APARTMENT-OWNERS ASS'N BD OF DIRECTORS v. Blume Dev. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Au v. AuHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  3. LaValle v. Aqualand Pool Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Meyer v. HansenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Steadman v. TurnerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API