L'Evesque v. Rognrud
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Dell, Chief Justice.
Defendants appeal from an order of the municipal court of Minneapolis denying their alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial. At the trial plaintiff’s and defendants’ versions of the facts were in conflict, but the verdict in plaintiff’s favor resolves the conflict and we must accept the facts as she stated them.
Plaintiff was a single woman, 75 years of age. In June 1954 she purchased an apartment building and during the following year made improvements on it. In March 1955 she decided to sell her property. Her intentipn was to secure…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Swanson v. DomningSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Lehman v. Hansord Pontiac Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Jacobson v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Lowrey v. DingmannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- Tysk v. GriggsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Leif M. Hanson v. Ford Motor Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1960
- Harry Bechtel and Cathleen Bechtel, Husband and Wife v. Liberty National Bank, a National Banking AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Clements Auto Co. v. Service Bureau Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
- Rochester Civic Theatre, Inc. v. Maria RamsayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1966
- Clements Auto Company v. Service Bureau CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1969
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.