Legal Opinion

Au v. Au

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1981No. 6706PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

OGATA, J.

The instant appeal concerns the application of the proper statute of limitations by the trial court to a five-count complaint brought by plaintiff-appellant Belinda Au (hereinafter appellant) against defendant-appellee Gordon Au, the owner of the home (hereinafter appellee Au), and defendant-appellee Herbert Hu, the salesperson (hereinafter appellee Hu), for damages resulting from water leakages in the residence purchased by appellant. Specifically, appellant appeals from an order of the trial court granting appellees’ motion to dismiss the complaint based on…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Triangle Underwriters, Inc. v. Honeywell, Inc. And Honeywell Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
  3. Lingsch v. SavageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Malone v. University of Kansas Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  5. De Haan v. WinterMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Baehr v. LewinHawaii Supreme Court · 1993
  2. CBS Inc. v. Ziff-Davis Publishing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Pele Defense Fund v. PatyHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Larsen v. Pacesetter Systems, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Towse v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1982

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API