Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Weir
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided August 7, 1901No. 4,540PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Iii Admiralty.
1Opinion of the Court
BELLINGER, District Judge.
This is a libel in personam to recover commissions for services as brokers in negotiating a charter for the bark Eaurelbauk. The charter party was concluded on May 10, 1898, between Taylor, Young & Co., as agents for the owners, and (he Portland Flouring Mills Company. The charter party contained this provision: “Vessel to be consigned (inward only) to charterers' agent at port of discharge, and there to pay to charterers, or their order, two and one half per cent, on amount of freight. A commission of five per cent, shall be paid to charterers and Taylor, Young &…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- The ThamesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1881
- Mallory v. The Crystal StreamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1885
- Grauman v. The HumboldtDistrict Court, D. Washington · 1898
- Zeigler v. The Paola R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Louisiana · 1887
- Richard v. HogarthDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1899
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cory Bros. & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- DC Andrews & Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
- European-American Banking Corp. v. M/S ROSARIADistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1979
- Brown v. West Hartlepool Steam Nav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1902
- Rhederei Actien Gesellschaft Oceana v. Clutha Shipping Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1915
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.