Legal Opinion
DC Andrews & Company v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 5, 1954No. 96-54PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LITTLETON, Judge.
Plaintiff sues for $13,764.82 claimed to be due it as brokerage commissions. The United States had chartered certain of its vessels to the India Supply Mission. Incorporated in the charter party was the following provision:
“Commission — Commission or brokerage is due and payable by the Owner in accordance with and to the extent of applicable regulations of the War Shipping Administration to * *
Plaintiff’s suit is based upon the alleged breach by the United States of the obligation to pay such brokerage commissions to plaintiff who acted as cargo broker for the Indian Supply…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- American Stevedores, Inc. v. PorelloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Matson Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- The ThamesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1881
- Pillsbury Flour Mills Co. v. Interlake S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Norton v. The Richard WinslowCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1896
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Northwest Marine Iron Works v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1974
- Alaska Barge and Transport, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Luckenbach Steamship Co. v. Coast Manufacturing & Supply Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1960
- Flota Maritima Browning De Cuba, Sociadad Anonima v. SnoblCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966
- European-American Banking Corp. v. M/S ROSARIADistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.