Richard v. Hogarth
District Court, D. New Jersey
This was a suit in admiralty to recover for services rendered for procuring a contract of affreightment for a vessel owned by respondents.
1Opinion of the Court
KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
This libel was fled by Oscar L. Richard and others, composing the firm of 0. Richard & Co., against Jolm Doe and Richard Roe, composing the Arm of J. Hogarth & Co., to recover compensation for effecting a contract of affreightment for the steamship Folbridge, belonging to respondents. The answer of the respondents admits the rendition of the service by the libelants, but alleges that this court has no jurisdiction over the subject matter of the libel. This objection I consider well taken, and in entire conformity with the practice and decisions of our courts. In…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- The ThamesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1881
- Selover v. SchoellkopfCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1898
- Mallory v. The Crystal StreamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1885
3Cited by8 opinions
- Cory Bros. & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Berton v. Tietjen & Lang Dry Dock Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1915
- DC Andrews & Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
- Seaboard Fisheries Co. v. Piedmont & Georges Creek Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1918
- Taylor v. WeirDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1901
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.