Legal Opinion

Brown v. West Hartlepool Steam Nav. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 7, 1902No. 1,079PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Florida.

1Per curiam

The libelants, as agents and brokers, represented the owners in procuring and executing a charter party, and ¿herein, in their own favor, inserted a stipulation as follows:

“A commission of five per cent, upon the gross amount of this charter, and the usual freight brokerage, payable by the steamship and owners, is due to Brown, Chip-ley & Co., upon the signing hereof, charter canceled or not canceled, steamship lost or not lost, and also upon any continuation or extension of this charter, or on sale of vessel.’’

The district court held that this stipulation is not a maritime obligation or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Taylor v. WeirDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1901

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Krauss Bros. Lumber v. Dimon Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Cory Bros. & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  3. E.S. Binnings, Inc. v. M/V Saudi RiyadhCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Rhederei Actien Gesellschaft Oceana v. Clutha Shipping Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1915
  5. Parsons & Whittemore, Inc. v. Rederiaktiebolaget NordstjernanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API