Crummer v. Zalk
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, P. J.
After 52 days of trial to the court without a jury, plaintiff had judgment against defendants Zalk and Beeler. Both defendants appeal. The appeal is upon the clerk’s transcript alone, although that transcript contains exhibits introduced at trial. Our statement of facts summarizes the findings.
In 1957, plaintiff exchanged his Oakland office building for defendant Beeler’s ranch near the San Mateo County coast. As part of this exchange agreement, Beeler was to manage the ranch properties until 1960. If plaintiff sold the ranch during that period for a price which, with ranch income, exceeded…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- People v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- White v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Pao Ch'en Lee v. GREGORICUCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Kompf v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Tahoe National Bank v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Millbrae Assn. for Residential Survival v. City of MillbraeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- City of Los Angeles v. RicardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Mendoza v. City of West CovinaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- RITSCHEL v. City of Fountain ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.