Legal Opinion

Wood v. Roy Lapidus, Inc.

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided December 8, 1980PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.

Some six months of confinement to a hospital bed following a skiing accident in the winter of 1967 inspired the defendant Roy Lapidus to invent a device which would prevent decubitus ulcers (bed sores). While still abed, Lapidus developed his “Lapidus Airfloat System” and obtained the occasional collaboration of the plaintiff Barry Wood, who was a social and business friend. This case concerns Wood’s share in the corporation, Roy Lapidus, Inc. (the corporation), which Lapidus had earlier organized and which came to manufacture and sell the Airfloat System.

From the trial judge’s findings of…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Robert Industries, Inc. v. SpenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  2. Samia v. Central Oil Co. of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  3. King Features Syndicate, Inc. v. Cape Cod Broadcasting Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Pittsfield & North Adams Railroad v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. Fay, Spofford & Thorndike, Inc. v. Massachusetts Port AuthorityMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co. v. Town of DanversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. City of Haverhill v. George Brox, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  3. MASSACHUSETTS MUNICIPAL WHOLESALE ELECTRIC v. DanversMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  4. Basis Technology Corp. v. Amazon.com, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2008
  5. Hunneman Real Estate Corp. v. Norwood Realty, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2002

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API