Fay, Spofford & Thorndike, Inc. v. Massachusetts Port Authority
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtKass, J.
Massachusetts Port Authority (Massport) entered into a written contract engaging the engineering services of Fay, Spofford & Thorndike, Inc. (FST), to design improvements for a runway at Logan Airport. After FST completed the design work and, indeed, after bids had been received from contractors, Massport reduced the scope of the work substantially. The parties ask us to resolve the manner in which Massport should compensate FST for designing that portion of the work which Massport decided not to build.
Procedurally, the case comes to us on Massport’s appeal from the entry of a judgment based…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Community National Bank v. DawesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
- Robert Industries, Inc. v. SpenceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Clark v. State Street Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
- Charles I. Hosmer, Inc. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
- King Features Syndicate, Inc. v. Cape Cod Broadcasting Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- J. A. Sullivan Corp. v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Targus Group International, Inc. v. ShermanMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- NEA-Coffeyville v. Unified School District No. 445Supreme Court of Kansas · 2000
- Diamond Crystal Brands, Inc. v. Backleaf, LLCMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- Wood v. Roy Lapidus, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.