Legal Opinion

H. M. Loud & Sons Lumber Co. v. Hagar

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Oscoda; Simpson, J. Replevin by the H. M. Loud & Sons Lumber Company against Henry D. Hagar. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

Plaintiff replevied from defendant a wagon which he bought at a sale made by the township treasurer to collect a tax which the treasurer claimed the plaintiff should pay. The case was tried by a jury, who rendered a verdict in favor of defendant. The case is brought here by plaintiff, assigning a number of errors in the trial.

The tax was levied upon several descriptions of real estate, which the plaintiff claims it did not own, but that they were owned by one Vaughn. It claimed that it took the title to the land simply to secure it for advances made to Vaughn, which advances had,been paid,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. Township of St. JosephMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Hill v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Hinds v. Township of BelvidereMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Petrie Lumber Co. v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Fletcher v. PostMichigan Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pendleton v. BriggsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1915
  2. Hamill v. GloverWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Township of Homer v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API