Legal Opinion

Petrie Lumber Co. v. Collins

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1887PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error to Muskegon. (Russell, J.) Replevin. Defendant brings error. The facts-are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

In July, 1885, the defendant, as marshal of the village of North Muskegon, levied upon six piles of lumber to satisfy a tax which was assessed in said village in the name of A. H. Petrie & Co.

*65The plaintiff, an incorporated company, brought this suit in replevin to recover possession of this lumber, claiming to be the owner thereof, and recovered judgment in the circuit court for Muskegon county for nominal damages.

The lumber was the property of plaintiff, but defendant resisted the right of possession claimed by it, on the ground that the tax by virtue of which he seized it was a valid tax…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Farnsworth Co. v. RandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1876

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Township of Caledonia v. RoseMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Hill v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Tousey v. PostMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Wade, Et Vir. v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  5. Bradley v. BouchardMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API