Fletcher v. Post
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Alpena. (Kelley, J.) Eeplevin. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.
This is an action of replevin for property seized by the defendant while city treasurer of Alpena, to satisfy a tax assessed against George N. Fletcher in the year 1891. Verdict was directed in favor of defendant for the amount of the tax, and the plaintiffs appealed.
1. It is contended by the plaintiffs that the assessment against George N. Fletcher does not justify the seizure of specific partnership property belonging to the firm of George N Fletcher & Sons. This is generally true. Haynes v. Knowles, 36 Mich. 408; Hutchinson v. Dubois, 45 Id. 143. The circuit judge, however, sustained the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hill v. GrahamMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Petrie Lumber Co. v. CollinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by7 opinions
- Blakemore v. CooperNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905
- Crawford v. KochMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Birmingham Vending Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1949
- Curry v. Lake Superior Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- City of Menominee v. S. K. Martin Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.