Legal Opinion

Timmons v. City of Hartford

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided September 16, 2003No. CIV.3:02CV1570 (AWT)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS

THOMPSON, District Judge.

The plaintiffs, Wade Timmons (“Tim-mons”) and Innovative Development Management Corp., a company owned and operated by Timmons, bring the following claims against the defendant, City of Hartford (the “City”): (1) a claim that the defendant violated the plaintiffs’ rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, (2) a claim for breach of contract, and (3) a claim for violation of the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (“CUTPA”), Conn. Gen.Stat. § 42-110a et seq. The complaint also includes claims for negligent and intentional infliction of emotional…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Jett v. Dallas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Young v. Suffolk CountyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
  2. Reyes Ex Rel. Reyes v. Fairfield PropertiesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2009
  3. Hargett v. Metropolitan Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
  4. Day v. DISTINCTIVE PERSONNEL, INC.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
  5. Evans-Gadsden v. Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossman, LLPDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API