Legal Opinion
Fitz v. NCR Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 27, 2004No. D041738PublishedCited by 89 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NARES, Acting P. J.
This case arises out of the termination of plaintiff Nancy Fitz’s employment with defendant NCR Corporation (NCR), and Fitz’s subsequent wrongful termination complaint against NCR. NCR appeals from a February 2003 ruling that found an arbitration clause in the company’s employee-dispute resolution policy to be unconscionable, and therefore unenforceable.
In her complaint against NCR, Fitz alleged causes of action for age discrimination, breach of implied contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, fraud and violation of public policy. NCR demurred…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Clinton Cole v. Burns International Security ServicesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- Little v. Auto Stiegler, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Stirlen v. Supercuts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Broughton v. Cigna HealthplansCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by89 opinions
- Lorrie Poublon v. C.H. Robinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Baltazar v. Forever 21, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2016
- Jacquelin Davis v. O'Melveny & Myers, a California Limited Liability CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Ragland v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Serafin v. Balco Properties Ltd., LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.