Legal Opinion
United States v. Donald J. Walsh, Jr., and Interrand Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 27, 1986No. 84-1650, 84-1660PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
After a jury trial, appellants were convicted of two counts of possessing a firearm which was not identified by a serial number in violation of 26 U.S.C. § SSeift). 1 On appeal, appellants contend that evidence received by agents of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (BATF) should have been suppressed and that 26 U.S.C. § 5861(i) should be construed to allow for a reasonable period of time within which to serialize a firearm. Because these contentions are not supported by existing precedent, we affirm.
Defendant-appellant Walsh, who is the president of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- John S. Pleasant v. Larry Lovell, Larry Hyatt, Vernon Pixley, Kenneth Batson and Tim FortuneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Edward Lee DonnesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Russell KinneyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. MichelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- State v. CoySupreme Court of Iowa · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.