Legal Opinion

United States v. Edward Lee Donnes

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 16, 1991No. 91-8003PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-appellant, Edward Lee Don-nes, entered a conditional guilty plea, Fed. R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2), to a charge of possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). Pursuant to a written plea agreement, defendant reserved his right to appeal the order of the district court denying his motion to suppress. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We reverse.

On appeal from the denial of a motion to suppress, “our standard of review is to accept the trial court’s findings of fact, unless clearly erroneous, and to consider the evidence…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Mincey v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. United States v. Cruz CorralCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
  2. Krise v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. HodgeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  4. United States v. George Dean MartinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
  5. United States v. Santos Villarreal and Sergio GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API