Legal Opinion
United States v. Michel
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 10, 2006No. 04-2214PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEYMOUR, Circuit Judge.
Mauricio Michel brings this appeal challenging, on sufficiency of the evidence grounds, his convictions for various gun possession and aiding and abetting charges pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2); 26 U.S.C. §§ 5841, 5845(a)(2), 5861(d), 5861(i), 5871. He also claims that his sentence should not have been enhanced under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). 18 U.S.C. § 924(e); see also U.S.S.G. § 4B1.4. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for resentenc-ing.
I
On December 31, 2001, an officer for the Lovington, New Mexico, police department…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- United States v. McCaneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. RufaiCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. ChristyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Conrad BlairCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.