Legal Opinion
The Loch Trool
District Court, N.D. California
Decided January 22, 1907No. 13,261PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DL fiíAVEN, District Judge.
The commissioner to whom the matter u,a.;, referred found that the libelant, owner of the ship Drum-ora •’ ¡f; entitled to recover the sum of $5,725, with interest thereon fro *i December 3, 1904, damages caused by the collision of that vessel ivifb the British ship Loch Trool, and the case is now before the couil v uji exceptions filed by the libelant to the commissioner’s report. Tin: grounds of exception are, in effect, first, that the commissioner ecu Vi hi not allowing damages for the Drumcraig’s loss of time while roick-iyoing the repairs made necessary by the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- The BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- The " Potomac"Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Williamson v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Sawyer v. OakmanU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1870
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Zeller Marine Corporation v. Nessa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Aktieselskapet Bonheur v. San Francisco & P. S. S. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923
- Bleakley Transportation Co. v. Colonial Sand & Stone Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
- Anthony O'boyle, Inc. v. The Tug Robin HoodDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1955
- The NantasketDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.