Legal Opinion

Anthony O'boyle, Inc. v. The Tug Robin Hood

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided May 13, 1955No. 18212PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ABRUZZO, District Judge.

On November 13, 1951, an interlocutory decree was entered holding both respondents, the tug Robin Hood and Dynamic, equally responsible for damages sustained by the steel tank barge, Russell No. 21, in a collision that occurred on August 24,1944, more than ten years ago. There had been a delay of seven years, from the date of the collision to the trial of the libel.

The Commissioner appointed by the Court held hearings on August 25, 1953, September 22, 1954, September 30, 1954, October 8, 1954, October 22, 1954, Oeto-bér 29, 1954, and November 19, 1954. *272His report was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. O'DOnnell Transp. Co., Inc. v. City of New York. The Kosciusko. The Don. The Anna F. O'DOnnellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  2. Zeller Marine Corporation v. Nessa CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  3. Streckfus Steamboat Line v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1928
  4. The Loch TroolDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Berg v. General Motors Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. United States v. Motor Vessel Gopher StateDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1979
  3. Midwest Marine, Inc. v. Sturgeon Bay Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API