Legal Opinion
The Nantasket
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided June 26, 1923No. 2056PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MORTON, District Judge.
The facts are covered by the agreed statement. Those material to the questions in controversy, which relate only to damages, may be summarized as follows:
It is a case of collision in fog between submarine chaser No. 125, owned by the United States, and the passenger steamer Nantasket, owned and operated by the claimant. It occurred on June 16, 1919, on Boston Harbor, and the “subchaser” was severely injured. She was a naval vessel, one of a large number of similar type built during the war. After having served in Mediterranean waters, she arrived in Boston on May 16,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- The ConquerorSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- The Loch TroolDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1907
- The SaginawDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899
- Sewall v. La ChampagneDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1892
- Fisk v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- The PriscillaDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1928
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. California Sea Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. Oceanic Steam Nav. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1931