Legal Opinion

State v. Ingram

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 2, 2003No. COA02-826Published

1Opinion of the Court

585 S.E.2d 253 (2003)

STATE of North Carolina,

v.

Jay Efram INGRAM, Defendant.

No. COA02-826.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

September 2, 2003.

Attorney General Roy Cooper, by Assistant Attorney General W. Wallace Finlator, Jr., for the State.

Duncan B. McCormick, Lillington, for the defendant-appellant.

WYNN, Judge.

From his conviction on the charge of armed robbery, defendant Jay Efram Ingram contends on appeal that the trial court erroneously (I) allowed the state's motion to alter the indictment; (II) overruled his objection to a series of questions regarding prior statements and behavior; and…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. SturdivantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. State v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. BeatySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. LyonsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API