Legal Opinion

State v. Beaty

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided August 3, 1982No. 97A81PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEYER, Justice.

We note initially that defendant has failed to comply with Rule 28(b)(2) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure requiring that the appellant’s brief contain a concise statement of the case. Nevertheless, we have gleaned from the record on appeal, particularly the testimony given at trial, the following summary of the facts.

On 12 December 1980 at about 2:15 p.m., the defendant and another man entered the Middlesex ABC store where the store manager Franklin Perry was then working. Defendant asked for two half-gallons of rum. Mr. Perry asked defendant if he wanted dark…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. State v. TuggleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. State v. YoungSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. State v. BardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. OlsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  4. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  5. State v. FieldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API