Legal Opinion

McEniry v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 15, 1985No. 253-84CPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LYDON, Judge:

This case involves defendant’s refusal to permit plaintiff’s reenlistment into the United States Army Reserve. The court is presented with defendant’s motion to dismiss the case based on a lack of subject matter jurisdiction or in the alternative its motion for summary judgment. In response, plaintiff filed his opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss, along with a cross-motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff maintains that defendant’s actions in denying his reenlistment were in violation of both due process standards and applicable regulations. After reviewing the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Wilkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Flowers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  3. Hernandez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
  4. Reed v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  5. Golding v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API