McEniry v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LYDON, Judge:
This case involves defendant’s refusal to permit plaintiff’s reenlistment into the United States Army Reserve. The court is presented with defendant’s motion to dismiss the case based on a lack of subject matter jurisdiction or in the alternative its motion for summary judgment. In response, plaintiff filed his opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss, along with a cross-motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff maintains that defendant’s actions in denying his reenlistment were in violation of both due process standards and applicable regulations. After reviewing the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Wilkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Flowers v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Hernandez v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1997
- Reed v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Golding v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.