Legal Opinion

Wilkins v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 31, 2002No. 00-55117PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge.

This case arises from a military chaplain’s claims that the Navy unconstitutionally administers its Chaplain Corps to prefer certain religious denominations. Ronald G. Wilkins, a non-liturgical protestant chaplain, filed a pro se complaint, requesting damages as well as declaratory and injunctive relief. The district court dismissed the complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), holding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction due to (1) the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Federal Claims, see 28 U.S.C. § 1491; (2) the Feres doctrine, see…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Chappell v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. James Chappel v. Laboratory Corporation of America, AKA National Health LabCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. StanleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Rostker v. GoldbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. Park Place Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Whitman v. MinetaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Daniel v. HagelDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
  4. Matsuo v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2006
  5. Marceau v. Blackfeet Housing AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API