Legal Opinion

Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Lundquist

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 28, 1928PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Graff, J.

I. The primary proposition on this appeal involves the correctness of the ruling of the industrial commissioner in holding that the appellant Lundquist at the time of his injury was not engaged in interstate commerce. The principal contention requires a brief statement of the record facts.

In 1926, the appellee, Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, was the owner of extensive yard facilities in the city of Cedar Rapids. Its main-line track extended north and south, and numerous yard and classification tracks paralleled the main line on the east side thereof. During' the late summer…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. New York Central Railroad Company v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Raymond v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Flint v. City of EldonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fire Association of Phila. v. Allis Chalmers Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1955
  2. Degray v. Miller Bros. Con. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1934
  3. Interstate Power Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Haverly v. Union Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  5. Rice v. Keystone View Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API