Legal Opinion

Rice v. Keystone View Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 2, 1941No. 32,675PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Justice.

This case comes here on writ of certiorari to the industrial commission to review its decision of July 9, 1940, vacating the order and findings of a referee and finding that the relation of employe and employer existed between S. E. Rice, deceased, and Bell & Howell Company, relator.

The facts are as follows: Relator, an Illinois corporation doing business in Minnesota, on April 17, 1936, entered into a contract with one S. E. Rice whereby the latter agreed to promote and sell exclusively the relator’s products in South Dakota, the western half of North Dakota, and the ten…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. District Court of Hennepin CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  2. Herron v. Coolsaet Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. Stansberry v. Monitor Stove Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  4. State ex rel. McCarthy Bros. v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1918
  5. McKesson-Fuller-Morrisson Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Aleckson v. Kennedy Motor Sales Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. Hagberg v. Colonial & Pacific Frigidways, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. Houle v. Stearns-Rogers Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. Holman v. Bulldog Trucking Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1993
  5. Hubbard v. Midland Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API