Legal Opinion

In Re CVPS/Verizon Act 250 Land Use Permit Numbers 7C1252 & 7C0677-2

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 6, 2009No. 2007-441PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSkoglund, J.

¶ 1. In this appeal, we consider the scope of Act 250 jurisdiction over utility line projects. Central Vermont Public Service Corporation (CVPS) sought an Act 250 permit to extend one of its electrical distribution lines. It appeals from the Environmental Court’s determination that it must not only obtain a permit pursuant to Act 250 Rule 70, 12 Code of Vt. Rules 004 060-18 to -20, which specifically applies to utility line projects, but it must also obtain an amendment to an existing Act 250 permit held by a third party and be named as a co-permittee on that permit.1 CVPS argues that the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. In Re: Constitutionality of House Bill 88Supreme Court of Vermont · 1949
  2. In Re Agency of Administration, Etc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  3. Committee to Save the Bishop's House, Inc. v. Medical Center Hospital of Vermont, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979
  4. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977
  5. In Re VitaleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re SP Land Co., LLC, Act 250 LUP AmendmentSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  2. Commercial U. Ins. Company v. City of MontpelierSupreme Court of Vermont · 1976
  3. In re North East Materials Group LLC ACT 250 JO 5-21 (Russell Austin, Pamela Austin, Julie Barre, Marc Bernier, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
  4. State v. McDonaldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  5. In re North East Materials Group LLC Act 250 JO 5-21Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API