Legal Opinion

In Re: Constitutionality of House Bill 88

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 6, 1949PublishedCited by 107 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Sherman R. Moulton

Chief Justice of the Vermont Supreme Court

178 South Prospect Street

Burlington, Vermont

Dear Mr. Chief Justice:

The Legislature of the State of Vermont has passed, and I have signed, House Bill No. 88 entitled “AN ACT TO PROVIDE FOR OPINIONS BY'THE SUPREME COURT ON THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF PENDING OR PROPOSED BILLS OR RESOLUTIONS AND ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS.” The following requests are made by virtue of this law.

I have grave doubts as to the constitutionality of House Bill No. 88, and I particularly refer to Section 5 of Chapter 2 of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chicago & Southern Air Lines, Inc. v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Morrow v. CorbinTexas Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Keller v. Potomac Electric Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Self-Insurer's Ass'n v. State Industrial CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by107 opinions

  1. Parker v. Town of MiltonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  2. Reyes v. Prince George's CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Chioffi v. Winooski Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  4. State Ex Rel. Morrison v. SebeliusSupreme Court of Kansas · 2008
  5. Wood v. WoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1977

102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API