Legal Opinion
In re North East Materials Group LLC Act 250 JO 5-21
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided July 17, 2015No. 14-190PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶ 1.
Robinson, J.
This case calls upon us to consider whether a post-1970 rock-crushing operation is exempt from Act 250 because *580it is located on a site within a large tract that includes multiple quarries and is a pre-1970 development itself exempt from Act 250 permitting requirements. The Superior Court, Environmental Division concluded that the pre-1970 dimension-stone-quarrying operations included intermittent crushing operations throughout the large tract, and that the new crushing operation thus fell within the grandfathered development and did not constitute a cognizable physical change…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Committee to Save the Bishop's House, Inc. v. Medical Center Hospital of Vermont, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1979
- In re Application of Lathrop Limited Partnership I, II and IIISupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- In Re Village Associates Act 250 Land Use PermitSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- In Re AudetSupreme Court of Vermont · 2004
- In re Request for Jurisdictional Opinion re: Changes in Physical Structure and Use at Burlington International Airport for F-35ASupreme Court of Vermont · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re North East Materials Group LLC ACT 250 JO 5-21 (Russell Austin, Pamela Austin, Julie Barre, Marc Bernier, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2015
- In re North East Materials Group LLC Act 250 JO 5-21 (Russell Austin, Pamela Austin, Julie Barre, Marc, Marc Bernier, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016
- In re North East Materials Group LLC Act 250 JO 5-21 (Russell Austin, Pamela Austin, Julie Barre, Marc, Marc Bernier, Appellants)Supreme Court of Vermont · 2016