Legal Opinion
Arkay Infants Wear, Inc. v. Kline's, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Missouri
Decided August 10, 1949No. 5712PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIDGE, District Judge.
In this infringement action the point is made that Section 1392(a) of the Revised Judicial Code, Title 28, U.S.C.A. § 1392(a), has changed the law relating to venue in such actions, as stated in Stonite Products Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co., 315 U.S. 561, 62 S.Ct. 780, 86 L.Ed. 1026 where suit is brought against two or more defendants residing in different judicial districts within the same State.
Plaintiff here joins Kline’s Inc. and Famous-Barr Company as defendants. The former corporation has a regular established place of business in this district. The latter company is…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stonite Products Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. National City Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. National City Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1948
- Gibbs v. Emerson Electric Mfg. Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1939
- Motoshaver, Inc. v. Schick Dry Shaver, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co. v. Barnes, JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
- Joseph P. Ruth, Sometimes Also Known as J. P. Ruth v. The Eagle-Picher Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Gulf Research & Development Co. v. Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 1950
- Kaeppler v. James H. Matthews & CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
- Pierce v. Perlite Aggregates, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.