Legal Opinion

Kaeppler v. James H. Matthews & Company

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 3, 1960No. Civ. A. 25618PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EGAN, District Judge.

This is a civil class action for treble damages and injunctive relief under the anti trust law.

The plaintiffs are five monument dealers in the Greater Philadelphia area who brought this action on behalf of themselves and all other monument dealers in that area. The fifth plaintiff was added by stipulation after the suit was started. The defendants are all of the leading cemetery memorial parks in that area and their supplier, James H. Matthews & Company, of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, The Gorham Manufacturing Co., and its sales subsidiary, Gorham Company, of Providence,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Company of New Jersey, Appts. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Georgia v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Harkness v. HydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1879

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Associated Musicians of Greater New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  2. Adams Dairy Company v. National Dairy Products Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1968
  3. Brown Ex Rel. Rhiner v. KerkhoffDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2007
  4. Cutler v. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF MUSICIANS OF US & CANADADistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  5. Illinois v. Brunswick Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API