Pierce v. Perlite Aggregates, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
LEMMON, District Judge.
Venue in a patent-infringement suit against a foreign corporation and venue in a cross-claim against'the same corporation based simply upon diverse citizenship, present the principal legal problems in this case.
1. The Various Motions.
There are several motions before this Court. First, there is one filed by the Muehleisen Perlite Process, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Texas, and hereinafter referred to as “Muehleisen corporation”, and Herman Muehleisen, its co-defendant, to dismiss the amended complaint as to them and also to dismiss the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gibbs v. BuckSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- General Electric Co. v. Marvel Rare Metals Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Stonite Products Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Carbide & Carbon Chemicals Corp. v. United States Industrial Chemicals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
- Urquhart v. American-La France Foamite CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1944
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Transmirra Products Corp. And Robert Aronstein v. Fourco Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Elliott v. Federal Home Loan Bank BoardDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1964
- Kamkap, Inc. v. Worldsbest Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Devex Corp. v. General Motors Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1983
- Picou v. Rimrock Tidelands, Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.