Legal Opinion

In re the Incorporated Village of Hempstead

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 24, 1968PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHoward T. Hogan, J.

In this eminent domain proceeding, the claimant seeks a subpoena duces tecum directing the condemnor to produce, at an examination before trial “ all appraisals submitted to any governmental agency or department or to the petitioner pertaining to Damage Parcel 7-6.”

The attorney for the petitioner asserts that if the appraisals are the property of the Federal Government, this court cannot issue a subpoena and that the records would be inadmissible at the trial.

The question concerning the ownership of the appraisals is not sufficiently explored either in fact or law by petitioner to warrant a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  2. In re the Town of Hempstead ex rel. Town of Hempstead Park DistrictNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  3. In re the Town of HempsteadNew York Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Niagara Falls Urban Renewal Agency v. Clifton Holding, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API