Legal Opinion
Irwin v. City of Minot
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 24, 2015No. 20140217PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Robert and Donna Irwin appealed from a summary judgment dismissing their inverse condemnation claim against the City of Minot. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I
[¶ 2] Robert and Donna Irwin own 8.12 acres of property located in Ward County. In 2011, the Souris River in Ward County flooded. The City of Minot (“City”) acted to combat the flood by constructing emergency earthen dikes running along municipal streets. Contractors were hired by the City to remove clay to construct the dikes from Darrell Sedevie’s property, whose land bordered the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Rose v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- United States v. Caltex (Philippines), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Bowditch v. BostonSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Holtz v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wilkinson v. Board of University and School Lands of the State of N.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Lenertz v. City of Minot N.D.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
- Northwest Landowners Association v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Northwest Landowners Association v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- Irwin v. City of MinotNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.