Legal Opinion

State v. Emerich

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 1883PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis Criminal Court, VaN Wagoner, J.

1Opinion of the CourtBakewell, J.

The indictment charges that defendant, at St. Louis, on December 30, 1877, made an assault upon the body of one Maggie Gibbons, then and there pregnant and “big with child,” and then and there unlawfully and feloniously used and employed upon her womb an instrument of hard substance by forcing it int® her womb with the intent to procure an abortion or the miscarriage of said Maggie Gibbons, the same not being necessary to preserve her life nor advised by a physician to be necessary for that purpose; that by means and in consequence of said employment of said instrument by defendant upon the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BarkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
  2. State v. RossSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
  3. State v. WallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
  4. State v. JoinerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MillerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  2. Weightnovel v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1903
  3. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  4. State v. CriddleSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
  5. State v. BressieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API